Death Penalty Opponents Say Resuming Federal Executions Is.
Opponents of the death penalty do not agree and have a valid argument when they say, “The claims that capital punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not proven.” The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end.
The death penalty is necessary and the only punishment suitable for those convicted of capital offenses. Seventy-five percent of Americans support the death penalty, according to Turner, because it provides a deterrent to some would-be murderers and it also provides for moral and legal justice (83).
Opponents of federal executions say the death penalty goes against trends on capital punishment, which has been abolished in 21 states.
Today 's death penalty system permits a lot of inequality and injustice. The general claim of the death penalty is full of loopholes. Execution of the death penalty is expensive and time-consuming. Billions of dollars each year are used for criminal death sentences. Perhaps the most common argument against the death penalty is its cost.
The claim is that the threat of capitalpunishment reduces violent crimes. Opponents of the death penalty do notagree and have a valid argument when they say, “The claims that capitalpunishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly notproven.” I am not refuting this accusation.
In contrast to the opponent’s view, supporters believe that religiously the death penalty is wrong because the Bible says “Thou shalt not kill”. sixth commandment) It is also argued that if killing is wrong, then the government should not use it as a form of punishment (Death Row on Trial 2001: video) “how can we kill people who kill people to show its wrong” (Death Row on Trial 2001.
The opponents of capital punishment claim that the death penalty has caused and can cause the execution of innocent people. However, according to the supporters, no evidence indicates that innocent people have been executed.
Methods will vary state by state. Although the United States still practices the death penalty, executions are declining, compare to the past, according to statistics. Those that are for the death penalty claims that the death penalty will serve as a deterrence and is the only way for retribution against murderers.
The death penalty allows saving taxpayers’ money because execution costs less. When it comes to Texas, one can distinguish certain reasons why there are so many executions. First of all, the overall population of Texas is greater than in every other American state (except California).
The death penalty is one of the cruelest types of criminal punishment, which is performed with the help of different methods such as hanging, electrocution, and lethal injections. It would be possible to say that the death penalty is an effective method of prevention of abhorrent crimes if the statistics showed that it decreased the number of.
Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form.
This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue. I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the Sunday New York Times. This publication has a wide.
Opponents of the death penalty have had many occasions to celebrate in the new millennium. Four states have abolished the practice in the past five years, while others have legally or effectively set moratoriums on executions.
